Before You Build on Sitecore XM Cloud — Get a Second Opinion & Avoid Overspending

Choosing Sitecore XM Cloud was the right move.

But what comes next — the architecture, component design, content structure, and execution model — will determine whether your investment delivers value or becomes unnecessarily expensive.

Before you lock into a proposal or development plan, getting a Second Opinion can help you avoid overbuilding, prevent costly decisions, and save up to 20% of your total implementation cost.

Why You Should Take a Second Opinion Even After Selecting XM Cloud

1. A Lot of XM Cloud Implementations Are Overestimated

Most proposals include:

• Extra components you may not need.
• Overcomplicated headless architecture.
• Custom code that XM Cloud already supports.
• Unnecessary infrastructure layers.
• Large UI/UX rebuilds that add no business value

These things quietly inflate your cost. A second opinion exposes these gaps instantly.

2. You Don’t Want to Spend More Than You Should

XM Cloud is powerful, but it doesn’t need to be expensive.

Many brands unknowingly overspend because they accept the first proposal they receive — without validating:

• Is the architecture tailored for your business?
• Are the components really required?
• Is the content model simplified or overly complex?
• Is the timeline realistic or padded?
• Is the development approach modern (Next.js, Vercel optimization, Edge caching)?

A second opinion gives you clarity before investing heavily.

3. Saving 20% of the Cost Is Absolutely Possible

With the right expert review, you can save 15–20% by:

• Removing components that won’t be used
• Simplifying content models
• Avoiding over-engineered DevOps setups
• Using XM Cloud’s built-in capabilities instead of custom code
• Protecting performance budgets early
• Optimizing the delivery approach

These savings come from smarter planning — not cutting quality.

What Our XM Cloud Second Opinion Covers

A focused, expert review of:

• Architecture & Headless Strategy

We check whether the architecture is modern, scalable, and not over-engineered.

• Component Library Scope

We identify components that don’t need to be built — saving cost instantly.

• Content Model Alignment

We make sure your editors won’t struggle and your team isn’t paying for complexity.

• Budget & Timeline Validation

We spot inflated estimates and suggest a realistic path.

• Performance & SEO Considerations

We ensure Lighthouse, accessibility, and Core Web Vitals are baked into the plan.

• Future Readiness

We validate multisite, multilingual, and composable readiness for the next 3–5 years.

Why This Matters

You don’t get a second chance to redo your XM Cloud architecture.

But you *do* have a chance to verify it before spending more than necessary.

A second opinion gives you:

• Cost savings (up to 20%)
• Confidence in your plan
• Clarity on what you actually need
• Protection from overengineering
• Assurance that your partner’s proposal is sound

This is your safety net before executing a big digital investment.

Get Your XM Cloud Second Opinion — Before You Spend More

If you've already selected XM Cloud, now is the best time to validate:

• The proposal
• The architecture
• The component plan
• The budget
• The delivery roadmap

We provide an independent, unbiased review — fast, clear, and business-focused.

Want us to review your XM Cloud proposal?

Share your document or brief and we'll help you ensure your implementation is efficient, cost-optimized and future-ready.

Written by

Ketan Garala

CEO of Arroact